11 April 2014

Pulitzer Predictions: 2014

Yay! It's Pulitzer Time!    
I do not believe I've actually ever done a prediction post like this before, but for some reason I feel emotionally invested in several contenders this year.  So let's have some fun, shall we?  I've been trolling many websites that are predicting the Pulitzer Prize winners this year.  I think some of them are right on the money and some of them are delusional (they apparently don't know the criteria for being considered for the prize).  Some of them, frankly, make me want to cry with their predictions. For good or for evil, we will know the results as of the afternoon of Monday, April 14.

The following books are all either books that I think are deserving of the committee's nod, or are likely to get the nod, or both.  I hope that y'all will chime in with your favorite picks and the most likely contenders for this year.

But first, let's explore why the Pulitzer books generate so much speculation and debate.  Why more so than the National Book Award or the National Book Critics Circle Award?  My hunch is that, unlike other major awards for book published in the US, it comes down to two points: (1) Unlike those other free-for-all awards, the Pulitzer Prize is awarded to an American writer [which means that Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's fine novel, Americanah, is ineligible. not that you'd know it from the various prediction lists on the interwebz.]. (2) More importantly, also unlike those awards, there is no longlist, much less no shortlist, published ahead of the award ceremony.  The winner and the finalists are revealed at the same time.

Okay, so here goes (knuckles cracking)...My top pick for either the winner or one of the finalists is Donna Tartt's The Goldfinch. I go on about it here, but it's earned tons of accolades from nearly everybody except the First Lady, who seemed to think that her review of the book was a platform for talking about nutrition in privileged families.

My other favorites would be, in no particular order, The Son by Philipp Meyer, A Tale for the Time Being by Ruth Ozeki, The Lowland by Jhumpa Lahiri, The Woman Upstairs by Clair Messud, and  A Constellation of Vital Phenomena by Anthony Marra.

There are other books I loved from 2014 that I think are worthy of the prize, but are total long shots: Flora by Gail Godwin and Benediction by Kent Haruf. I'd love for either of them to win, but I doubt it will happen.

Then there are the books out there that I haven't read, but which I think are strong contenders.  Namely George Saunders' story collection The Tenth of December and The Good Lord Bird by James McBride.  While I would prefer that the prize go to a book I've already read and loved, I wouldn't be either upset or surprised if one of these won.


And then there are the books that I am actively hoping will not win, because if they, I will probably have to slit my throat.  Actually, in this case it comes down to just one book: Rachel Kushner's The Flamethrowers.  I hate and revile that loathsome book. Seriously, I might have been exaggerating for effect, but this book was laughably bad, which is why it is so completely mysterious to me for it to be getting the kind of critical attention that it's been getting.  Some betting operations have even listed this book as the odd-on favorite. Ugh.


 

Which brings me, at last, to the other categories.  Other than the winners themselves, who really cares about the other Pulitzer winners beyond the fiction awards, or at least cares as much?  Harsh but true.  In a twist of irony, novels get all of the glory in a prize that was originally created to acknowledge outstanding journalism.  I don't really have a stake in the other categories, other than general nonfiction, for which I'm hoping that Sheri Fink's excellent  Five Days at Memorial puts in a good showing. It was without a doubt the finest nonfiction book I read last year. (Hint: I only read 17 works of nonfiction compared to the 100+ works of fiction, so it's not like I'm drawing from a wide base. Even so, Fink's book would stand out.)

What about you, gentle reader?  Which books that you read from  2013 deserve to be recognized by the Pulitzer committee?  Or if you want to be wicked, which books do not?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Edited on 14 April 2014 to gloat add: Donna Tartt's The Goldfinch is the winner!  I'm really quite pleased about this.  I'm also delighted that Philipp Meyer's excellent novel, The Son, turned out to be a finalist.  The Woman Who Lost Her Soul by Bob Shacochis wasn't even on my radar, so shame on me.  In fact, it was so not on my radar that I returned a copy of this book two weeks ago to the publisher. 

13 comments:

  1. I'm going to have to read The Goldfinch at some point, but for some reason I really don't want to!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I'm of the opinion that book bloggers should read what they want to read. If that excludes The Goldfinch, then so be it! :)

      Delete
  2. I would pick "A Tale for the Time Being" which was a wonderful read but I think Donna Tartt will win.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Ozeki was just so utterly fresh and unusual. I loved it, but it would be a riskier choice than the Tartt. Though perhaps not riskier than Jennifer Egan's Visit From the Good Squad a few years ago...

      Delete
  3. I haven't read a single of your predictions. Whoooops. The Goldfinch is on my radar. I will get to it at some point

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, predictions are meaningless. And the year that the Pulitzer Committee refused to tap one of the three finalists, I wouldn't have given credence to any of 'em.

      Delete
  4. I'm embarrassed to say I don't think I read any new fiction that was of that quality last year. I did buy The Lowland though, and it's sitting on my shelf waiting to be read.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Had you read any of the books that the critics were buzzing about, and you didn't like them,or other?

      Delete
  5. IT'S ALREADY ALMOST TIME? That is nuts.

    I would be pretty satisfied with The Goldfinch or The Lowland winning this year, too. (1) Because I've actually read them. (2) Because they were written by ladies.

    I can't WAIT to start Five Days at Memorial, but I'm also dreading the sadness. The second someone compared it to Columbine by Dave Cullen, I immediately got it from the library...and now I'm just looking at it pensively.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yay for the ladies! I haven't read Columbine, so I cannot compare, but Five Days At Memorial is pretty fine stuff.

      Delete
  6. Congratulations on your amazing foresight....I'm reading "The Goldfinch" even as we speak!!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. kindle had "The Goldfinch" at a reduced price the other day. Maybe I should have picked it up.

    ReplyDelete
  8. As you might know, my own reading tends to the mystery side, however I do have THE GOLDFINCH reserved and I do read historical non-fiction. At my age, I guess I prefer books that take me away rather than open my eyes any further to current reality. Does that make any sense? Still, I like to keep an eye on things literary when I have a free moment. My favorite Pulitzer Prize winners were EMPIRE FALLS by Richard Russo and THE AMAZING ADVENTURES OF KAVALIER AND CLAY by Michael Chabon. Both superb books. So I have high hopes for THE GOLDFINCH. :)

    ReplyDelete

Please, sir, may I have some more? (Comments, that is!)