09 July 2013

Top Ten Tuesday: Books Into Movies


It's been a good long time since I've participated in the TTT meme, but this week's happens to be a repeat of one I participated in a couple of years ago, so I'm reposting.  ;-)

Sponsored by The Broke & the Bookish, this week's topic is top ten book-to-movie adaptations. I suspect that this list will be more controversial than most. It's no secret that books have certain advantages over their film versions: namely, the luxury of time to tell the tale properly and the unlimited imagination of the reader. I used to be one of those folks who condemned books-into-movies, ipso facto.  Now I don't care as much if the director & screenplay writer aren't true to the letter of the book as long as they are true to the spirit of the book.  It's a tremendous bonus if the movies actually give me a new insight into the books.   Also, I'm only including books which I've read on this list. So here's my list of books-into-movies where I read the book and LOVED the movie. In no particular order:

I am not left handed!
1) The Princess Bride by William Goldman.  One of the most eminently quotable movies EVER. Anybody want a peanut?

2) Legends of the Fall by Jim Harrison.  Best. Novella. Ever. As far as I'm concerned, anyway.  Didn't like the film until after I had read the book.  Then, boy howdy, I loved it! And no, that love is not actually related to Brad Pitt, though I admit I think it's his best role.

3) The Fellowship of the Ring by J. R. R. Tolkien.  Yes, I do distinguish the first part of the film trilogy as being significantly better than the subsequent two.  I emphatically did not like the pointless addition of a battle scene and the mucking around with essence of Faramir's and Boromir's characters from the other two movies.

Yeah, I'm a Snape fan.
4) Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban by J. K. Rowling.  In my opinion, the pinnacle of Rowling's plotting and writing--and Cuaron was the only director who brought something more (read "better") to the film version.  Back when we thought Jo would allow for some Slytherin redemption by the end of the series.  But don't get me started down that road...

5) The Godfather by Mario Puzo.  Because it's an expected answer. I didn't actually make it all the way through the book, but I read enough for it to qualify in this part of the list instead of in the Honorable Mentions below.

6) The Silence of the Lambs by Thomas Harris.  If there's a more chillingly charismatic on-screen villain than Sir Anthony Hopkins's Hannibal Lector, I've not seen the likes of it.  Talk about a great cast, raising a book from pulp fiction to something memorable.

7) The Notebook by Nicholas Sparks.  God bless him for his sense of romance and his ability to publish a book every year while reading 5-6 books per week (yes, I interviewed him once and this is what he said), but a great stylist he ain't.  I think this book makes a pretty fine romantic drama, however.  This is one of the truly rare cases where the movie is better than the book.

8) Q & A by Vikras Swarup (known to the English speaking world as the film Slumdog Millionaire).  One of those cases where the plot points didn't overlap all that much, but where the spirit of the book was translated well into film.

9) The Last of the Mohicans by James Fennimore Cooper.  Yes, they're almost unrecognizable as springing from the same source.  But it's a fine, fine movie with an excellent soundtrack.

10) The Black Stallion by Walter Farley.  I wanted to work another children's or YA book onto the list, but the movie really does stand on its own merits.  Beautifully filmed!

Ooh, but that leaves out Out of Africa by Isak Dinesen, which was wonderful!  I had to eliminate all Jane Austen adaptations or else there'd be very little room for other movies.  Or the Twilight franchise. (Just kidding--wanted to see if you were paying attention!) I thought this would be a difficult list to compile, but there are actually far more good film versions of books than I can name here.

Honorable mentions for movies I've seen and thought were excellent, but whose antecedents I have not read: The Reader, Casino Royale, The Shawshank Redemption, The Children of Men, Chocolat, Forrest Gump, and The Name of the Rose There are lots of others, but I think I'll leave it there for now.  

What did I leave out?  What would you have on your list?  

20 comments:

  1. Yes, I'm reminded of Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings. Well made versions of good books, I think. Thanks for sharing your list.

    Here's my Top Ten Best Movie Adaptations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. YES! Last of the Mohicans made my list too.

    I love THE NOTEBOOK movie, but I can't bring myself to read the book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yay for Last of the Mohicans. And for Daniel Day-Lewis!

      The Notebook was not a great book--but it's a good story that transformed well into the different medium.

      Delete
  3. I was not a fan of The Prisoner of Azkaban it was actually my least favorite movie =/ I do agree with Princess Bride though and can't believe I didn't put it on my list!

    Emily @ Falling For YA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've heard that from multiple people re: Prisoner of Azkaban film.

      Delete
  4. The Princess Bride made my list too! I love that movie and when I read the book, I couldn't help fall in love with it too!

    My TTT
    Alex @ The Book Banner

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, Princess Bride seems to be making the rounds today, to nobody's surprise. :)

      Delete
  5. I really need to read The Princess Bride. I love the movie.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ack, the 3rd HP movie. We differ so much on that :-)

    Totally agree about The Notebook! It was so much better as a movie. And The Princess Bride, classic as ever.

    I read Chocolat & really liked it, but haven't seen the movie yet. I kind of forgot about it... but I'm looking forward to seeing it eventually!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, HP. We need to have a reunion weekend or something for all of us participants to sit around debate minutiae.

      I've wondered whether I should read Chocolat or not...the sequel came out a year ago but didn't do well in terms of sales, but maybe I could do a double-header of them

      Delete
  7. The Princess Bride made my list, too. I love the movie... and the book!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh, I agree that Prisoner of Azkaban was not only the best of the movies but also just a good movie. The little touches that the director adds are great, while still remaining true to the book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah--we get a lot of hints in the film version of PoA that aren't really present in the books. Particularly re: Snape, which, of course is what matter most to me. :)

      Delete
  9. Chocolat is a wonderful book, I went through a real Joanne Harris phase when I was about 17. It's very different from the film (mostly to do with the Johnny Depp sub-plot) but it keeps the essence well. Of course, I haven't read/seen it in awhile, so I might have a completely different opinion now!

    Children of Men is fantastic as both film and book, but they're almost nothing alike except that in the future people can't have babies, and then someone does. The person who has a baby is different, the plot of the novel is different, the ending is different.

    I read The Reader right after seeing the film, and I remember really liking it, but I can't remember if it's different to the film, or if it's better than the film. That's perhaps not such a great sign!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the confirmation, Kayleigh. I own a copy of Chocolat but I'v never cracked it open.

      I tend to really like it when the book and the movie are both really good, but really different. Makes it easier to appreciate both.

      Delete
    2. I agree completely.

      I'm a lot more lenient with films based on books than a lot of bloggers, so as long as the intention of the book remains, I'm alright with them being different. Except for in cases of things like HP and The Hunger Games, for whatever reasons, changes to those books make me really annoyed.

      Delete
  10. I adore CHOCOLAT the book and the movie! The book differs a bit from the movie but I still think it's a great adaptation (all the changes make pretty good sense to me for the medium). I highly recommend reading it, though, especially considering she's continued some of the story. (Harris is a favorite of mine)

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am very hard on movies made from books. I don't try to be; I just am. I haven't participated in a TTT in a while either. I'll have to check out everyone's lists :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm so impressed that you're blogging in paradise! And I love that Snape/Rickman clip too. As usual, your tastes echo mine, so thanks for reminding me of so many fine films. Goblet of Fire was my favorite HP book and also my fave HP film, so at least we diverge on one (albeit minor) point!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I sorta wish Cuaron had direct all of the HP movies (although I haven't seen 6 or either 7 so maybe those kicked ass).

    ReplyDelete

Please, sir, may I have some more? (Comments, that is!)