I picked up the advance reading copy of Sophie Jordan's Uninvited to read because the first sentence of the description reads: "When Davy Hamilton tests positive for the Homicidal Tendency Syndrome, aka 'the kill gene,' she loses everything." Sold! As someone who was once shunned by my church group for having SATANIC TENDENCIES (I kid you not)*, I knew I wanted to read about Davy.
Big mistake.
Davy, short for Davina, is a musical prodigy AND beautiful AND fairly smart AND popular AND wealthy AND in love with her perfect boyfriend. She's also a pretty nice person. In other words, she's your typical Mary Sue. Until one day she's uninvited from her prestigious prep school (because it's too posh to expel anybody) for carrying a particular gene. The US has been overrun with violent crime and they've isolated said gene and are now in the process of rounding up everybody who has it. Most carriers are being put in concentration camps. Carriers with special talents are put into boot camps to become assassins for the government. Guess which one Davy qualifies for? If Davy were a more interesting character, that might sound interesting, right? Good jumping off point for a new dystopian series and all that.
Unless your mindsent tends more towards the Bella-from-Twilight-only-romance-can-save-me-girls-aren't-as-good-as-boys brand of thinking, skip this one. This book had tremendous potential but lacked all of the following: subtlety, follow-through on the most interesting parts , a strong female lead, and anything that could pass for character development. Davy is one of the most preposterous characters I've ever met. Her thought process is embarrassingly shallow and her take on gender equality would have been progressive had this book been written 30 years ago. Why the author thought it would be reasonable for Davy to still be in regular school at the age of 17 when she sat down to a piano at the age of three and could miraculously play a Chopin piece that she'd heard once before, in an elevator (in other words, probably Chopin Muzak and not actually Chopin), I couldn't say. In fact, Davy's planning to move to New York to attend Juilliard once she finished her senior year at the posh school, but there's nothing about her or her parents in this book that makes me think this character wouldn't have had a private tutor and gone to Juilliard at the ripe old age of, say, 12.
The book is also narrated in first person, present tense, which is the most annoying POV for me. Your miles may vary on that one. But first person present tense largely depends on the tell, not show brand of storytelling and you can never, EVER get into the mind of a narrator the way you can with third person.
I'm sure non-particular readers of all ages will love this one. I daresay I would have liked it as a teenager. But Davy is so insipid and two dimensional that I actually laughed out loud while reading what passes for her inner thoughts and musings. Being stuck in her head for a few hundred pages? Not a treat. Which makes it all the more extraordinary that I finished this book (albeit with heavy skimming), but I did it for you, gentle reader, so that you might escape this claptrap and read something of value instead.
* It was a Southern Baptist church I attended on Sunday evenings because practically the entire small town went there. I went to an Episcopal church on Sunday mornings (which I also kinda hated, but they didn't put me in the center of a circle to pray for me, so there's that), which probably qualified as a Satanic tendency in small town Mississippi in the 1980s. That, and my preference for wearing black, sleeping late, and listening to the Dead Milkmen were apparently enough to clinch the Satanic Tendencies of the Year award for me. I wish I were making this up.
NB: I read an advance reading copy of this book that was sent to my store. It will be published by Harper Teen in 2014.
P. S. Happy birthday, Mom!
Big mistake.
Davy, short for Davina, is a musical prodigy AND beautiful AND fairly smart AND popular AND wealthy AND in love with her perfect boyfriend. She's also a pretty nice person. In other words, she's your typical Mary Sue. Until one day she's uninvited from her prestigious prep school (because it's too posh to expel anybody) for carrying a particular gene. The US has been overrun with violent crime and they've isolated said gene and are now in the process of rounding up everybody who has it. Most carriers are being put in concentration camps. Carriers with special talents are put into boot camps to become assassins for the government. Guess which one Davy qualifies for? If Davy were a more interesting character, that might sound interesting, right? Good jumping off point for a new dystopian series and all that.
Unless your mindsent tends more towards the Bella-from-Twilight-only-romance-can-save-me-girls-aren't-as-good-as-boys brand of thinking, skip this one. This book had tremendous potential but lacked all of the following: subtlety, follow-through on the most interesting parts , a strong female lead, and anything that could pass for character development. Davy is one of the most preposterous characters I've ever met. Her thought process is embarrassingly shallow and her take on gender equality would have been progressive had this book been written 30 years ago. Why the author thought it would be reasonable for Davy to still be in regular school at the age of 17 when she sat down to a piano at the age of three and could miraculously play a Chopin piece that she'd heard once before, in an elevator (in other words, probably Chopin Muzak and not actually Chopin), I couldn't say. In fact, Davy's planning to move to New York to attend Juilliard once she finished her senior year at the posh school, but there's nothing about her or her parents in this book that makes me think this character wouldn't have had a private tutor and gone to Juilliard at the ripe old age of, say, 12.
The book is also narrated in first person, present tense, which is the most annoying POV for me. Your miles may vary on that one. But first person present tense largely depends on the tell, not show brand of storytelling and you can never, EVER get into the mind of a narrator the way you can with third person.
I'm sure non-particular readers of all ages will love this one. I daresay I would have liked it as a teenager. But Davy is so insipid and two dimensional that I actually laughed out loud while reading what passes for her inner thoughts and musings. Being stuck in her head for a few hundred pages? Not a treat. Which makes it all the more extraordinary that I finished this book (albeit with heavy skimming), but I did it for you, gentle reader, so that you might escape this claptrap and read something of value instead.
* It was a Southern Baptist church I attended on Sunday evenings because practically the entire small town went there. I went to an Episcopal church on Sunday mornings (which I also kinda hated, but they didn't put me in the center of a circle to pray for me, so there's that), which probably qualified as a Satanic tendency in small town Mississippi in the 1980s. That, and my preference for wearing black, sleeping late, and listening to the Dead Milkmen were apparently enough to clinch the Satanic Tendencies of the Year award for me. I wish I were making this up.
NB: I read an advance reading copy of this book that was sent to my store. It will be published by Harper Teen in 2014.
P. S. Happy birthday, Mom!
I DOWNLOADED THAT GIF LAST WEEK
ReplyDeleteFirst person present tense is theeeeee worst. Thank you for finishing it, but I'm sorry you had to, madam. Because it sounds gross.
Alice, I'm just a giver. That's me. Reading bad books so YOU don't have to.
ReplyDeleteOy, did I see your Julia Roberts gif last week and subliminally think of it for this post? Sorry if I did!
No no! *Downnnnloaded.* So it's in my folder. But I have not used it.
DeleteWow this sounds terrible. Mary Sue characters are the worst.
ReplyDeleteDid they really put you in the center of a circle to pray away your Satanic tendencies? And can you really pray away "sleeping in"? I have so many questions.
They really did. I had to sit in a metal folding chair in the middle of a group of junior high and high school kids. The weird thing is that my 14-year-old self actually submitted to it instead of storming out of there in a huff, letting loose a string of expletives like my 40 year old self would.
DeleteBUT DOES IT HAVE A LOVE TRIANGLE? Dammit, woman. Tell us what we want to know!
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry you were traumatized by the Southern Baptists. They can be...upsetting. But at least they didn't make you speak in tongues on command. Satan probably wouldn't have allowed it anyway.
There are no love triangles in book one BUT it is, I have learned, the first book in a series, so there's always hope.
DeleteI don't know why, but this scenario just popped into my head. Probably because you inspire me to think weird things, which I mean as the greatest of all possible compliments:
Q: Who's your daddy?
A: Satan's my daddy, sir.
Probably would have gone over quite well.
Buuuuuuuuuuuuummer. It's like The Registry, which I wanted to love, but it just disappointed on so many levels. Le sigh!
ReplyDeleteI don't know The Registry, but now I will be sure to stay away from it. Ha!
DeleteI have so many feelings about your church story. They are not happy feelings. Prayer circles are actually for, you know, praying for people and things as opposed to shaming people for things you don't like. Besides, black is slimming and I'm pretty sure sleeping in is one of the primary ways we know Jesus loves us....
ReplyDeleteAs for the book, I'm sorry it's so disappointing. What a waste of an interesting premise!
Oddly enough, my feelings about it aren't that happy either. ;)
DeleteWish I'd had the aplomb to use your responses back then. Alas!
Hahaha! I have this one on my to read list. Hmm. May have to rethink it.
ReplyDelete